Iniva: Inclusive and Incentive-compatible Vote Aggregation - Paper accepted

Iniva uses a tree with fallbacks to disseminate blocks and aggregate signatures.

Arian’s Iniva paper is accepted for publication at DSN'24

Many blockchain platforms use committee-based consensus for scalability, finality, and security. In this consensus scheme, a committee decides which blocks get appended to the chain, typically through several voting phases. Platforms typically leverage the committee members’ recorded votes to reward, punish, or detect failures. A common approach is to let the block proposer decide which votes to include, opening the door to possible attacks. For example, a malicious proposer can omit votes from targeted committee members, resulting in lost profits and, ultimately, their departure from the system.

Our paper presents Iniva, an inclusive and incentive-compatible vote aggregation scheme that prevents such vote omission attacks. Iniva relies on a tree overlay with carefully selected fallback paths, making it robust against process failures without needing reconfiguration or additional redundancy. Our analysis shows that Iniva significantly reduces the chance to omit individual votes while ensuring that omitting many votes incurs a significant cost. In addition, our experimental results show that Iniva enjoys robustness, scalability, and reasonable throughput. Platforms like Ethereum.

A preliminary version can be found on arXiv.

Arian Baloochestani Asl
Arian Baloochestani Asl
PhD Candidate

EDIT ME!

Hanish Gogada
Hanish Gogada
PhD Candidate

Interested in Distributed Systems and BFT protocols.

Leander Jehl
Leander Jehl
Associate professor

Design, implementation and verification of reliable distributes systems, including the incentivization of decentralized systems.

Hein Meling
Hein Meling
Professor of Distributed Systems

My main interest is in secure and dependable distributed computing, including cryptocurrencies and blockchains.